Granulomatosis with polyangiitis in an adolescent male with chronic cough and pulmonary nodules
- 1 Division of Respiratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 2 Division of Pediatric Respirology, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- 3 Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Correspondence to Dr Kevan Dilip Mehta; mehtak24@mcmaster.ca
Abstract
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a small to medium vessel vasculitis that is uncommon in paediatrics. However, with chronic cough often being the initial symptom, a common complaint and a median age of diagnosis of 14 years, it is nevertheless an important condition for paediatricians to consider as it can otherwise go undiagnosed for a long period of time. In this case report, we discuss a paediatric patient with GPA that presented with non-specific respiratory symptoms for several months and was then found to have pulmonary nodules on chest imaging once a broader differential diagnosis was considered. We will review the common presentation of GPA, the classification criteria and its management. This will ultimately assist any providers in identifying and managing GPA cases.
Background
Chronic cough is a frequent patient complaint in all age groups. While common causes need to be considered first, it is important to include unusual or sinister aetiologies in the right circumstances. Our patient’s chronic cough was misdiagnosed for months and ineffectively treated with steroid inhalers and antibiotics. A key lesson of his case is to ensure that there is ongoing re-evaluation of patient symptoms, particularly for unusual features or red flags, and initiating further investigations, as appropriate. In our adolescent patient, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) was the cause of the chronic cough. While GPA is rare, especially in paediatrics, it is a diagnosis that can be easily missed if not considered in the right context.
GPA is a small to medium vessel vasculitis that likely has an autoimmune basis. The reported prevalence of GPA across all age groups ranges from 2.3 to 146 cases per million people,1 and much rarer in children. In paediatrics, the median age of diagnosis is about 14 years and the median time-to-diagnosis, from symptom onset, is approximately 3 months. The typical clinical presentation includes a triad of upper airway, lower respiratory tract and renal manifestations, but symptoms generally are insidious and can be non-specific, such as dyspnoea, chronic cough and constitutional symptoms (ie, fever, malaise, fatigue, weight loss). In some cases, the clinical presentations can be much more striking with pulmonary haemorrhage, upper airway obstruction and/or renal failure.
In this case report, the reader will gain an appreciation for the patient’s clinical presentation, the diagnostic workup and treatment, and patient response. We will also provide a topical overview of the common GPA presentation, classification criteria and management.
Case presentation
An adolescent male presented to a community hospital’s emergency department with a progressively worse dry cough over the last year, post-tussive emesis, malaise and new-onset fevers and night sweats. Weight loss (approximately 20 pounds over 1 year) and intermittent epistaxis were also noted. He had travelled to South Asia 2 years prior, but there were no known tuberculosis (TB) contacts. His medical history included asthma, anaphylaxis to peanuts, eczema, psoriasis and environmental allergies. In the last year, he was prescribed inhaled fluticasone and salbutamol, as well as montelukast, with minimal benefit; he had also been treated with a course of antibiotics previously without effect.
On physical examination, he had a temperature of 37°C, heart rate of 68 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 18 breaths per minute, oxygen saturations of 100% on room air and blood pressure of 97/62 mmHg. Head and neck examination was unremarkable, including no evidence of lymphadenopathy or stridor. There were no signs of respiratory distress or abnormal breath sounds on respiratory examination. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable. A chest X-ray (CXR) showed pulmonary nodules and a cavitary lesion (figure 1). Based on these findings, he was was subsequently transferred to our institution for further workup and management.
A chest X-ray showing pulmonary nodules in the right upper and left lower lobes. A cavitary lesion is seen in the left lower lobe.
Investigations
A chest computerized tomography (CT) scan confirmed multiple nodules, adding that some were cavitary lesions (figure 2). Bloodwork showed a mild normocytic anaemia, leucocytosis, neutrophilia, slightly elevated International Normalized Ratio (INR) and high C-Reactive Protein (134.5 g/L). The remainder of the bloodwork and urinalysis were unremarkable. Infectious workup included nasopharyngeal viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) swab, throat swab culture, TB gastric aspirate cultures and a Mantoux test, which were all negative. Bronchoscopy and broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) were unremarkable with normal airway anatomy and no evidence of pulmonary haemorrhage or infection. Allergy skin prick testing (including aspergillus) was negative. Vasculitis panel revealed cytoplasmic pattern Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (cANCA) positivity (>8.0 AI units). Ultrasound guided transthoracic needle biopsy was done and showed evidence of diffuse interstitial reactive fibrosis with fibroblastic nodules, patchy necrosis, fibrin and abscesses with poorly formed granulomatous reaction.
A chest CT scan confirming multiple soft tissue nodules, some with spiculated margins and a cavitary lesion located in the right upper lobe.
Differential diagnosis
The differential diagnosis for chronic cough is broad but is a bit more focused once pulmonary nodules are discovered. Generally speaking, one can approach the differential diagnosis from a systems-based perspective, considering infectious, inflammatory, congenital, vascular, malignant, benign and other causes, as summarised in (table 1). In this case, infectious aetiologies were ruled out with nasopharyngeal viral PCR swab, bacterial throat culture, TB gastric aspirate cultures, BAL culture and Mantoux skin test. Malignant causes were not likely based on the pattern on CT imaging, Complete Blood Count results and history. Congenital causes were also ruled less likely based on a lack of symptoms as an infant/young child and appearance/location of the lesions on CT imaging. The autoimmune bloodwork and histopathology helped to finalise the cause as inflammatory rather than benign or malignant lesions.
Differential diagnoses to consider for pulmonary nodules on chest imaging
Appearance | Solid | Cavitary |
Infectious | Bacterial (eg, mycobacterial) Fungal (eg, histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, aspergillus) Parasitic (eg, echinococcus, pneumocystis pneumonia) Tracheobronchial papillomatosis |
Bacterial (eg, staph aureus, klebsiella, mycobacterial) Fungal (eg, histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, aspergillus) Parasitic (eg, echinococcus, pneumocystis pneumonia) Postpneumonic pneumatocele Septic emboli |
Inflammatory | Pulmonary vasculitis Rheumatoid nodule |
Pulmonary vasculitis Light chain deposition disease |
Vascular | Arteriovenous malformation Pulmonary infarct Haematoma |
Pulmonary infarct |
Malignancy | Metastatic lesion | Metastatic lesion |
Other | Sarcoidosis | Sarcoidosis Langerhans cell histiocytosis Congenital pulmonary airway malformation |
-
This list represents some differential diagnoses to consider when there are pulmonary nodules found on chest imaging. This is not meant to be an exhaustive list of differentials.
Treatment
A diagnosis of GPA was made using the new American College of Rheumatology and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) criteria (see table 2) and the patient was started on induction therapy. His regimen included pulsed corticosteroids and rituximab. Subsequently, for maintenance, he was initiated on high-dose oral corticosteroids with a tapering protocol and rituximab. In the literature, there are other therapeutic options that could be considered for induction (eg, cyclophosphamide) and maintenance (eg, azathioprine, mycophenolate and methotrexate). However, these other options may not be well tolerated or be less efficacious, leading to our decision to use corticosteroids and rituximab.
Childhood granulomatosis with polyangiitis ACR/EULAR criteria4
Clinical criteria | |
Nasal involvement: bloody discharge, ulcers, crusting, congestion, blockage or septal defect/perforation | +3 |
Cartilaginous involvement (inflammation of ear or nose cartilage, hoarse voice or stridor, endobronchial involvement, or saddle nose deformity) | +2 |
Conductive or sensorineural hearing loss | +1 |
Laboratory, imaging and biopsy criteria | |
Positive test for cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (cANCA) or antiproteinase 3 (anti-PR3) antibodies | +5 |
Pulmonary nodules, mass or cavitation on chest imaging | +2 |
Granuloma, extravascular granulomatous inflammation or giant cells on biopsy | +2 |
Inflammation, consolidation or effusion of the nasal/paranasal sinuses, or mastoiditis on imaging | +1 |
Pauci-immune glomerulonephritis on biopsy | +1 |
Positive test for perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA) or antimyeloperoxidase (anti-MPO) antibodies | −1 |
Blood eosinophil count ≥1×109/L | −4 |
Sum the scores for 10 items, if present. A score of ≥5 is needed for classification of granulomatosis with polyangiitis |
-
ACR, American College of Rheumatology; EULAR, European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology.
If untreated, the prognosis of GPA is almost universally fatal and the long-term morbidities, even in treated GPA, may include persistent airway obstruction and renal insufficiency, emphasising the importance of early diagosis and treatment. Therapeutic options are typically based on disease severity with severe disease defined as having any life or organ threatening manifestations, such as alveolar haemorrhage or glomerulonephritis. Treatment is often subdivided into phases: induction and maintenance. For induction, the current guidelines recommend rituximab and corticosteroids, and for maintenance, rituximab is preferred±low-dose steroids or steroid-sparing agents, such as low-dose methotrexate, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil.2
Outcome and follow-up
The patient responded well to induction therapy with no significant side effects and initial improvement of his symptoms within a few weeks. While on maintenance therapy, a follow-up CXR was completed and showed improvements in the pulmonary nodules and cavitary lesions (figure 3). Over about 2 months, he became fully asymptomatic, returning to full activity, such as playing basketball, essentially at the level prior to the onset of his illness. He continues to be followed in a specialised respiratory/rheumatology vasculitis clinic with good control of his disease. He is in the process of weaning the maintenance corticosteroids slowly; of note, he has experienced some side effects of chronic steroid use, such as striae and weight gain.
Follow-upchest X-ray after induction and while on maintenance therapy.
Discussion
GPA is a small to medium vessel vasculitis, the pathophysiology of which is not fully understood and likely a combination of genetic susceptiblity, environmental factors and dysregulation of the immune system playing a role. A common pathway is the autoimmune response to components of the neutrophil. This leads to the inappropriate activation of neutrophils, causing a cascade of different immune pathways that results in an imbalance of helper T-cell and effector T-cell responses, leading to tissue damage. There is also evidence that the complement pathway is involved. While any tissue can be affected, the commonly affected areas are the upper and lower respiratory tract, and the kidneys.3
Recently, ACR and EULAR jointly published new classification criteria for GPA.4 The candidate items in the classification criteria were based on an international dataset consisting of 578 GPA cases and 652 comparators. The final classification criteria items were then tested against a validation dataset consisting of 146 GPA cases and 161 comparators. Ultimately, the final criteria and their weightings (table 2) include bloody nasal discharge, nasal crusting or sinonasal congestion (+3); cartilaginous involvement (+2); conductive or sensorineural hearing loss (+1); cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) or anti-proteinase 3 ANCA positivity (+5); pulmonary nodules, mass, or cavitation on chest imaging (+2); granuloma or giant cells on biopsy (+2); inflammation or consolidation of the nasal/paranasal sinuses on imaging (+1); pauci-immune glomerulonephritis (+1); perinuclear ANCA or antimyeloperoxidase ANCA positivity (−1);eosinophil count ≥1×109/L (−4).4 A total score of 5 or more would confer a classification of GPA.
It is important to recognise the difference between diagnostic and classification criteria. Diagnostic criteria are the clinical features used to diagnose a patient’s condition, whereas classification criteria are used to create a homogenous patient population for inclusion into clinical trials and research studies. This implies that classification criteria may be more stringent than diagnostic criteria. The reader may also note that the previous 1990 ACR classification criteria1 5 is different than the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria.4 Robson et al identified the need for the updated classification criteria due to the decreased sensitivity of the 1990 criteria, increasing use of ANCA testing and other diagnostic imaging modalities4.
In searching the literature, there are no large multicentre studies focusing on GPA, much less in adolescents. The literature is mainly a combination of case reports, retrospective studies and cross-sectional analyses with ranging sample sizes of 3–65.6–11 Most of the reports discuss the presentation of GPA and the management that was used. However, this was before the development of the new 2022 ACR/EULAR GPA classification criteria and there continues to be a notable lack of literature on clinical trials in this age group. This highlights the importance of continuing to publish cases to add to our understanding of this condition in paediatrics and to ensure that healthcare providers are aware of this rare but clinically important condition.
Learning points
-
Cough is a common presenting complaint to many healthcare providers and can easily be dismissed as either infectious and/or asthma when it is acute or chronic, respectively. It is important to take a thorough history including a review of systems and red flags (eg, weight loss, night sweats) to ensure that appropriate investigations for other relevant aetiologies are done in a timely fashion. It is also important to have continual follow-up to reassess if the clinical picture is evolving or if the patient does not respond as expected to the treatment of the initial diagnosis.
-
When pulmonary nodules are detected on imaging, there is a broad differential diagnosis to consider. Each of these must be carefully evaluated with appropriate clinical assessments and specialist/subspecialist consultations, as necessary.
-
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis can present at any age and should be considered in paediatric and adult patients alike. Clinical manifestations can be insidious; therefore, a high degree of clinical suspicion is needed to not miss or delay this diagnosis. Moreover, establishing this diagnosis as soon as possible is very important for treatment and prognosis.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Contributors WW drafted the initial manuscript and reviewed/revised the manuscript. KDM reviewed/revised the manuscript.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer